TSTP Solution File: NUM668^4 by E---3.1.00

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : E---3.1.00
% Problem  : NUM668^4 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v7.1.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_E %s %d THM

% Computer : n028.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Sat May  4 08:56:08 EDT 2024

% Result   : Theorem 0.69s 0.65s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.69s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   11
%            Number of leaves      :   28
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   51 (  30 unt;  16 typ;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :  121 (  40 equ;   0 cnn)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    6 (   3 avg)
%            Number of connectives :  167 (  28   ~;   5   |;   3   &;  99   @)
%                                         (   0 <=>;  32  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   11 (   2 avg)
%            Number of types       :    2 (   0 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :   49 (  49   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of symbols     :   19 (  16 usr;   5 con; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   79 (  64   ^  15   !;   0   ?;  79   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
thf(decl_22,type,
    is_of: $i > ( $i > $o ) > $o ).

thf(decl_23,type,
    all_of: ( $i > $o ) > ( $i > $o ) > $o ).

thf(decl_25,type,
    in: $i > $i > $o ).

thf(decl_61,type,
    imp: $o > $o > $o ).

thf(decl_62,type,
    d_not: $o > $o ).

thf(decl_71,type,
    non: $i > ( $i > $o ) > $i > $o ).

thf(decl_72,type,
    l_some: $i > ( $i > $o ) > $o ).

thf(decl_77,type,
    e_is: $i > $i > $i > $o ).

thf(decl_123,type,
    nat: $i ).

thf(decl_124,type,
    n_is: $i > $i > $o ).

thf(decl_127,type,
    n_some: ( $i > $o ) > $o ).

thf(decl_142,type,
    n_pl: $i > $i > $i ).

thf(decl_147,type,
    diffprop: $i > $i > $i > $o ).

thf(decl_148,type,
    d_29_ii: $i > $i > $o ).

thf(decl_216,type,
    esk60_0: $i ).

thf(decl_217,type,
    esk61_0: $i ).

thf(def_d_not,axiom,
    ( d_not
    = ( ^ [X76: $o] : ( imp @ X76 @ ~ $true ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.D1ZycVBoW1/E---3.1_27733.p',def_d_not) ).

thf(def_imp,axiom,
    ( imp
    = ( ^ [X74: $o,X75: $o] :
          ( X74
         => X75 ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.D1ZycVBoW1/E---3.1_27733.p',def_imp) ).

thf(def_all_of,axiom,
    ( all_of
    = ( ^ [X3: $i > $o,X2: $i > $o] :
        ! [X4: $i] :
          ( ( is_of @ X4 @ X3 )
         => ( X2 @ X4 ) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.D1ZycVBoW1/E---3.1_27733.p',def_all_of) ).

thf(def_is_of,axiom,
    ( is_of
    = ( ^ [X1: $i,X2: $i > $o] : ( X2 @ X1 ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.D1ZycVBoW1/E---3.1_27733.p',def_is_of) ).

thf(def_non,axiom,
    ( non
    = ( ^ [X1: $i,X2: $i > $o,X4: $i] : ( d_not @ ( X2 @ X4 ) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.D1ZycVBoW1/E---3.1_27733.p',def_non) ).

thf(def_l_some,axiom,
    ( l_some
    = ( ^ [X1: $i,X2: $i > $o] :
          ( d_not
          @ ( all_of
            @ ^ [X4: $i] : ( in @ X4 @ X1 )
            @ ( non @ X1 @ X2 ) ) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.D1ZycVBoW1/E---3.1_27733.p',def_l_some) ).

thf(def_e_is,axiom,
    ( e_is
    = ( ^ [X1: $i,X101: $i,X102: $i] : ( X101 = X102 ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.D1ZycVBoW1/E---3.1_27733.p',def_e_is) ).

thf(def_diffprop,axiom,
    ( diffprop
    = ( ^ [X1: $i,X207: $i,X4: $i] : ( n_is @ X1 @ ( n_pl @ X207 @ X4 ) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.D1ZycVBoW1/E---3.1_27733.p',def_diffprop) ).

thf(def_n_is,axiom,
    ( n_is
    = ( ^ [Z0: $i,Z1: $i] : ( Z0 = Z1 ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.D1ZycVBoW1/E---3.1_27733.p',def_n_is) ).

thf(def_d_29_ii,axiom,
    ( d_29_ii
    = ( ^ [X1: $i,X210: $i] : ( n_some @ ( diffprop @ X1 @ X210 ) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.D1ZycVBoW1/E---3.1_27733.p',def_d_29_ii) ).

thf(def_n_some,axiom,
    ( n_some
    = ( ^ [Z0: $i > $o] :
          ( ! [X437: $i] :
              ( ( in @ X437 @ nat )
             => ( ( Z0 @ X437 )
               => ~ $true ) )
         => ~ $true ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.D1ZycVBoW1/E---3.1_27733.p',def_n_some) ).

thf(satz18,conjecture,
    ( all_of
    @ ^ [X1: $i] : ( in @ X1 @ nat )
    @ ^ [X1: $i] :
        ( all_of
        @ ^ [X263: $i] : ( in @ X263 @ nat )
        @ ^ [X264: $i] : ( d_29_ii @ ( n_pl @ X1 @ X264 ) @ X1 ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.D1ZycVBoW1/E---3.1_27733.p',satz18) ).

thf(c_0_12,plain,
    ( d_not
    = ( ^ [Z0: $o] :
          ( Z0
         => ~ $true ) ) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[def_d_not]) ).

thf(c_0_13,plain,
    ( imp
    = ( ^ [Z0: $o,Z1: $o] :
          ( Z0
         => Z1 ) ) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[def_imp]) ).

thf(c_0_14,plain,
    ( all_of
    = ( ^ [Z0: $i > $o,Z1: $i > $o] :
        ! [X4: $i] :
          ( ( Z0 @ X4 )
         => ( Z1 @ X4 ) ) ) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[def_all_of]) ).

thf(c_0_15,plain,
    ( is_of
    = ( ^ [Z0: $i,Z1: $i > $o] : ( Z1 @ Z0 ) ) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[def_is_of]) ).

thf(c_0_16,plain,
    ( non
    = ( ^ [Z0: $i,Z1: $i > $o,Z2: $i] :
          ( ( Z1 @ Z2 )
         => ~ $true ) ) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[def_non]) ).

thf(c_0_17,plain,
    ( d_not
    = ( ^ [Z0: $o] :
          ( Z0
         => ~ $true ) ) ),
    inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[c_0_12,c_0_13]) ).

thf(c_0_18,plain,
    ( l_some
    = ( ^ [Z0: $i,Z1: $i > $o] :
          ( ! [X410: $i] :
              ( ( in @ X410 @ Z0 )
             => ( ( Z1 @ X410 )
               => ~ $true ) )
         => ~ $true ) ) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[def_l_some]) ).

thf(c_0_19,plain,
    ( all_of
    = ( ^ [Z0: $i > $o,Z1: $i > $o] :
        ! [X4: $i] :
          ( ( Z0 @ X4 )
         => ( Z1 @ X4 ) ) ) ),
    inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[c_0_14,c_0_15]) ).

thf(c_0_20,plain,
    ( non
    = ( ^ [Z0: $i,Z1: $i > $o,Z2: $i] :
          ( ( Z1 @ Z2 )
         => ~ $true ) ) ),
    inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[c_0_16,c_0_17]) ).

thf(c_0_21,plain,
    ( e_is
    = ( ^ [Z0: $i,Z1: $i,Z2: $i] : ( Z1 = Z2 ) ) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[def_e_is]) ).

thf(c_0_22,plain,
    ( l_some
    = ( ^ [Z0: $i,Z1: $i > $o] :
          ( ! [X410: $i] :
              ( ( in @ X410 @ Z0 )
             => ( ( Z1 @ X410 )
               => ~ $true ) )
         => ~ $true ) ) ),
    inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[c_0_18,c_0_19]),c_0_17]),c_0_20]) ).

thf(c_0_23,plain,
    ( diffprop
    = ( ^ [Z0: $i,Z1: $i,Z2: $i] :
          ( Z0
          = ( n_pl @ Z1 @ Z2 ) ) ) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[def_diffprop]) ).

thf(c_0_24,axiom,
    ( n_is
    = ( ^ [Z0: $i,Z1: $i] : ( Z0 = Z1 ) ) ),
    inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[def_n_is,c_0_21]) ).

thf(c_0_25,plain,
    ( d_29_ii
    = ( ^ [Z0: $i,Z1: $i] :
          ( ! [X448: $i] :
              ( ( in @ X448 @ nat )
             => ( ( Z0
                  = ( n_pl @ Z1 @ X448 ) )
               => ~ $true ) )
         => ~ $true ) ) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[def_d_29_ii]) ).

thf(c_0_26,axiom,
    ( n_some
    = ( ^ [Z0: $i > $o] :
          ( ! [X437: $i] :
              ( ( in @ X437 @ nat )
             => ( ( Z0 @ X437 )
               => ~ $true ) )
         => ~ $true ) ) ),
    inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[def_n_some,c_0_22]) ).

thf(c_0_27,plain,
    ( diffprop
    = ( ^ [Z0: $i,Z1: $i,Z2: $i] :
          ( Z0
          = ( n_pl @ Z1 @ Z2 ) ) ) ),
    inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[c_0_23,c_0_24]) ).

thf(c_0_28,plain,
    ( d_29_ii
    = ( ^ [Z0: $i,Z1: $i] :
          ( ! [X448: $i] :
              ( ( in @ X448 @ nat )
             => ( ( Z0
                  = ( n_pl @ Z1 @ X448 ) )
               => ~ $true ) )
         => ~ $true ) ) ),
    inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[c_0_25,c_0_26]),c_0_27]) ).

thf(c_0_29,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X688: $i] :
        ( ( in @ X688 @ nat )
       => ! [X687: $i] :
            ( ( in @ X687 @ nat )
           => ( ! [X686: $i] :
                  ( ( in @ X686 @ nat )
                 => ( ( ( n_pl @ X688 @ X687 )
                      = ( n_pl @ X688 @ X686 ) )
                   => ~ $true ) )
             => ~ $true ) ) ),
    inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[satz18])]),c_0_19]),c_0_28]) ).

thf(c_0_30,negated_conjecture,
    ! [X1305: $i] :
      ( ( in @ esk60_0 @ nat )
      & ( in @ esk61_0 @ nat )
      & ( ~ ( in @ X1305 @ nat )
        | ( ( n_pl @ esk60_0 @ esk61_0 )
         != ( n_pl @ esk60_0 @ X1305 ) )
        | ~ $true )
      & $true ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_29])])])])]) ).

thf(c_0_31,negated_conjecture,
    ! [X1: $i] :
      ( ~ ( in @ X1 @ nat )
      | ( ( n_pl @ esk60_0 @ esk61_0 )
       != ( n_pl @ esk60_0 @ X1 ) )
      | ~ $true ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_30]) ).

thf(c_0_32,negated_conjecture,
    ! [X1: $i] :
      ( ( ( n_pl @ esk60_0 @ esk61_0 )
       != ( n_pl @ esk60_0 @ X1 ) )
      | ~ ( in @ X1 @ nat ) ),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[c_0_31]) ).

thf(c_0_33,negated_conjecture,
    in @ esk61_0 @ nat,
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_30]) ).

thf(c_0_34,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_32]),c_0_33])]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.15  % Problem    : NUM668^4 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v7.1.0.
% 0.07/0.17  % Command    : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.18/0.37  % Computer : n028.cluster.edu
% 0.18/0.37  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.18/0.37  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.18/0.37  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.18/0.37  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.18/0.37  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.18/0.37  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.18/0.37  % DateTime   : Fri May  3 09:54:33 EDT 2024
% 0.18/0.38  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.24/0.55  Running higher-order theorem proving
% 0.24/0.55  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover-ho --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.D1ZycVBoW1/E---3.1_27733.p
% 0.69/0.65  # Version: 3.1.0-ho
% 0.69/0.65  # Preprocessing class: HSLMSMSSLLLCHSA.
% 0.69/0.65  # Scheduled 6 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.69/0.65  # Starting lpo1_fix with 900s (3) cores
% 0.69/0.65  # Starting full_lambda_9 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.69/0.65  # Starting almost_fo_4 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.69/0.65  # Starting new_ho_9 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.69/0.65  # Starting pre_casc_4 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.69/0.65  # Starting ho_unfolding_6 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.69/0.65  # lpo1_fix with pid 27836 completed with status 0
% 0.69/0.65  # Result found by lpo1_fix
% 0.69/0.65  # Preprocessing class: HSLMSMSSLLLCHSA.
% 0.69/0.65  # Scheduled 6 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.69/0.65  # Starting lpo1_fix with 900s (3) cores
% 0.69/0.65  # No SInE strategy applied
% 0.69/0.65  # Search class: HGHSM-FSLM32-MHSMMSBN
% 0.69/0.65  # Scheduled 11 strats onto 3 cores with 900 seconds (900 total)
% 0.69/0.65  # Starting full_lambda_5 with 82s (1) cores
% 0.69/0.65  # Starting new_ho_6 with 82s (1) cores
% 0.69/0.65  # Starting pre_casc_4 with 82s (1) cores
% 0.69/0.65  # new_ho_6 with pid 27848 completed with status 0
% 0.69/0.65  # Result found by new_ho_6
% 0.69/0.65  # Preprocessing class: HSLMSMSSLLLCHSA.
% 0.69/0.65  # Scheduled 6 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.69/0.65  # Starting lpo1_fix with 900s (3) cores
% 0.69/0.65  # No SInE strategy applied
% 0.69/0.65  # Search class: HGHSM-FSLM32-MHSMMSBN
% 0.69/0.65  # Scheduled 11 strats onto 3 cores with 900 seconds (900 total)
% 0.69/0.65  # Starting full_lambda_5 with 82s (1) cores
% 0.69/0.65  # Starting new_ho_6 with 82s (1) cores
% 0.69/0.65  # Preprocessing time       : 0.011 s
% 0.69/0.65  
% 0.69/0.65  # Proof found!
% 0.69/0.65  # SZS status Theorem
% 0.69/0.65  # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.69/0.65  # Parsed axioms                        : 365
% 0.69/0.65  # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 0
% 0.69/0.65  # Initial clauses                      : 854
% 0.69/0.65  # Removed in clause preprocessing      : 484
% 0.69/0.65  # Initial clauses in saturation        : 370
% 0.69/0.65  # Processed clauses                    : 49
% 0.69/0.65  # ...of these trivial                  : 2
% 0.69/0.65  # ...subsumed                          : 1
% 0.69/0.65  # ...remaining for further processing  : 46
% 0.69/0.65  # Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 0
% 0.69/0.65  # Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 0.69/0.65  # Backward-subsumed                    : 0
% 0.69/0.65  # Backward-rewritten                   : 0
% 0.69/0.65  # Generated clauses                    : 24
% 0.69/0.65  # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 19
% 0.69/0.65  # ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
% 0.69/0.65  # Contextual simplify-reflections      : 0
% 0.69/0.65  # Paramodulations                      : 10
% 0.69/0.65  # Factorizations                       : 0
% 0.69/0.65  # NegExts                              : 0
% 0.69/0.65  # Equation resolutions                 : 4
% 0.69/0.65  # Disequality decompositions           : 0
% 0.69/0.65  # Total rewrite steps                  : 5
% 0.69/0.65  # ...of those cached                   : 0
% 0.69/0.65  # Propositional unsat checks           : 0
% 0.69/0.65  #    Propositional check models        : 0
% 0.69/0.65  #    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.69/0.65  #    Propositional clauses             : 0
% 0.69/0.65  #    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.69/0.65  #    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
% 0.69/0.65  #    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
% 0.69/0.65  #    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
% 0.69/0.65  #    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
% 0.69/0.65  #    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
% 0.69/0.65  #    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
% 0.69/0.65  #    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
% 0.69/0.65  # Current number of processed clauses  : 46
% 0.69/0.65  #    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 27
% 0.69/0.65  #    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.69/0.65  #    Negative unit clauses             : 4
% 0.69/0.65  #    Non-unit-clauses                  : 15
% 0.69/0.65  # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 340
% 0.69/0.65  # ...number of literals in the above   : 1207
% 0.69/0.65  # Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 0.69/0.65  # Current number of archived clauses   : 0
% 0.69/0.65  # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 39
% 0.69/0.65  # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 35
% 0.69/0.65  # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 0
% 0.69/0.65  # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 33
% 0.69/0.65  # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 0.69/0.65  # BW rewrite match attempts            : 1
% 0.69/0.65  # BW rewrite match successes           : 0
% 0.69/0.65  # Condensation attempts                : 49
% 0.69/0.65  # Condensation successes               : 0
% 0.69/0.65  # Termbank termtop insertions          : 77835
% 0.69/0.65  # Search garbage collected termcells   : 29198
% 0.69/0.65  
% 0.69/0.65  # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.69/0.65  # User time                : 0.068 s
% 0.69/0.65  # System time              : 0.012 s
% 0.69/0.65  # Total time               : 0.079 s
% 0.69/0.65  # Maximum resident set size: 6588 pages
% 0.69/0.65  
% 0.69/0.65  # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.69/0.65  # User time                : 0.090 s
% 0.69/0.65  # System time              : 0.029 s
% 0.69/0.65  # Total time               : 0.119 s
% 0.69/0.65  # Maximum resident set size: 2272 pages
% 0.69/0.65  % E---3.1 exiting
% 0.69/0.65  % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------